Practical judgment as reflective judgment: On moral salience and Kantian particularist universalism
نویسندگان
چکیده
Moral particularists and generalists alike have struggled over how to incorporate the role of moral salience in ethical reasoning. In this paper, I point neglected resources Kant account for maxim formation: Kant's theory reflective judgment. tasks judgment with picking out salient empirical particulars formation into maxims, associating it purposiveness, or intentional activity (action on ends). The unexpected Kantian suggest possibility a particularist universalism, where recalcitrant directly inform, some cases revise, principles. Such an improves accounts perception: rather than deriving sensitivity solely from agent's upbringing cultural resources, dimension is situated alongside universalist principles typically identified ethics, allowing critical approach both universals reception particulars.
منابع مشابه
Disgust as embodied moral judgment.
How, and for whom, does disgust influence moral judgment? In four experiments participants made moral judgments while experiencing extraneous feelings of disgust. Disgust was induced in Experiment 1 by exposure to a bad smell, in Experiment 2 by working in a disgusting room, in Experiment 3 by recalling a physically disgusting experience, and in Experiment 4 through a video induction. In each c...
متن کاملMaldynia as a moral judgment?
Lippe rejected out of hand the idea advanced by Morris [5] that pain was a pluralistic concept. Rather, he asserted “the biomedical basis of maldynia.” In Lippe’s medicocentric view of pain, “maldynia” was neither a symptom nor a syndrome but an “illness with endogenous and exogenous components.” Thus defined, “eudynia” becomes a teleologically beneficial mechanism, whereas “maldynia” is “usele...
متن کاملTime and moral judgment.
Do moral judgments hinge on the time available to render them? According to a recent dual-process model of moral judgment, moral dilemmas that engage emotional processes are likely to result in fast deontological gut reactions. In contrast, consequentialist responses that tot up lives saved and lost in response to such dilemmas would require cognitive control to override the initial response. C...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: European Journal of Philosophy
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['0966-8373', '1468-0378']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12811